<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Copper Trader&#039;s Tax Credit Dispute Remanded for Reassessment Due to Overlooked Evidence and Procedural Oversight.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74419</link>
    <description>Wrong availment and utilization of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The petitioner, engaged in the business of dealing in copper waste and scrap, provided ledger accounts, tax invoices, and E-way bills as evidence of legitimate purchases, but the Assessing Officer did not consider these documents. The court found that the impugned orders lacked discussion on the petitioner&#039;s documents and did not address deficiencies or inadequacies in the evidence provided. Consequently, the matters were remanded for reconsideration, with the second respondent directed to reissue a fresh assessment order after giving the petitioner a reasonable opportunity. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 11:14:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 11:14:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Copper Trader&#039;s Tax Credit Dispute Remanded for Reassessment Due to Overlooked Evidence and Procedural Oversight.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74419</link>
      <description>Wrong availment and utilization of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The petitioner, engaged in the business of dealing in copper waste and scrap, provided ledger accounts, tax invoices, and E-way bills as evidence of legitimate purchases, but the Assessing Officer did not consider these documents. The court found that the impugned orders lacked discussion on the petitioner&#039;s documents and did not address deficiencies or inadequacies in the evidence provided. Consequently, the matters were remanded for reconsideration, with the second respondent directed to reissue a fresh assessment order after giving the petitioner a reasonable opportunity. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 11:14:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>