<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1107 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448708</link>
    <description>HC allowed a writ petition challenging a penalty order under GST Act. The court found no evidence of intentional tax evasion and noted confusion caused by legislative changes. Successive notifications and lack of clarity led to incorrect penalty imposition. The HC quashed the penalty orders, providing relief to the petitioner based on judicial precedents highlighting administrative inconsistencies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1107 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448708</link>
      <description>HC allowed a writ petition challenging a penalty order under GST Act. The court found no evidence of intentional tax evasion and noted confusion caused by legislative changes. Successive notifications and lack of clarity led to incorrect penalty imposition. The HC quashed the penalty orders, providing relief to the petitioner based on judicial precedents highlighting administrative inconsistencies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>