<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1099 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448700</link>
    <description>A challenge to refusal to revoke GST registration cancellation failed where the authorities recorded a categorical finding that the electricity payment receipt and rental agreement uploaded for registration were forged. On that factual basis, the appellate authority held that revocation could not be granted, and the HC found no reason to differ. Interference with the cancellation and the appellate order was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1099 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448700</link>
      <description>A challenge to refusal to revoke GST registration cancellation failed where the authorities recorded a categorical finding that the electricity payment receipt and rental agreement uploaded for registration were forged. On that factual basis, the appellate authority held that revocation could not be granted, and the HC found no reason to differ. Interference with the cancellation and the appellate order was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>