<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1091 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, WEST BENGAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448692</link>
    <description>Upfront premium for a thirty-year lease of land for a commercial office complex was found outside entry 41 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) because the exemption applies only to long-term leases of industrial plots or plots for infrastructure for financial business, and only where the supplier is a specified government development body or an entity with 20% or more government ownership. The material showing SMPK as an autonomous body, a tax deductor, and CAG-audited did not establish the required government ownership or control, and section 51 tax-deductor status was held insufficient to satisfy the exemption condition. The leasing supply was therefore not exempt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1091 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, WEST BENGAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448692</link>
      <description>Upfront premium for a thirty-year lease of land for a commercial office complex was found outside entry 41 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) because the exemption applies only to long-term leases of industrial plots or plots for infrastructure for financial business, and only where the supplier is a specified government development body or an entity with 20% or more government ownership. The material showing SMPK as an autonomous body, a tax deductor, and CAG-audited did not establish the required government ownership or control, and section 51 tax-deductor status was held insufficient to satisfy the exemption condition. The leasing supply was therefore not exempt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>