<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1088 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal concerning the re-valuation of the Infrared Thermometer, finding a violation of natural justice as the importer was not given an opportunity for rebuttal. The original authority&#039;s re-determination was deemed improper. Conversely, the appeal regarding the enhancement of the transaction value for the Fingertip Pulse Oximeter was dismissed, as no specific challenge was raised during the appeal. The judgment was delivered on 23.01.2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 08:33:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1088 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal concerning the re-valuation of the Infrared Thermometer, finding a violation of natural justice as the importer was not given an opportunity for rebuttal. The original authority&#039;s re-determination was deemed improper. Conversely, the appeal regarding the enhancement of the transaction value for the Fingertip Pulse Oximeter was dismissed, as no specific challenge was raised during the appeal. The judgment was delivered on 23.01.2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>