<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1634 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311997</link>
    <description>For statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the date on which the accused is produced before court and remanded to custody is excluded from computing the 60-day or 90-day period. The Bombay High Court relied on a later Supreme Court decision, which had considered the earlier view and held that the remand date must be left out when calculating the time for filing the charge-sheet. On that basis, the argument that the remand date should be counted was rejected, and the petitioner was not entitled to statutory bail on that ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 08:33:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1634 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311997</link>
      <description>For statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the date on which the accused is produced before court and remanded to custody is excluded from computing the 60-day or 90-day period. The Bombay High Court relied on a later Supreme Court decision, which had considered the earlier view and held that the remand date must be left out when calculating the time for filing the charge-sheet. On that basis, the argument that the remand date should be counted was rejected, and the petitioner was not entitled to statutory bail on that ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>