<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1374 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311996</link>
    <description>Contributory negligence could not be presumed from a head-on collision alone; where the tribunal&#039;s finding of rash and negligent driving by the truck was supported by the record, interference was unwarranted and the plea was rejected. In the death claim of a 51-year-old housewife, the compensation was enhanced on the basis of notional income, multiplier, consortium, loss of love and affection, and funeral expenses. In the claim concerning a 22-year-old unmarried man, the compensation was reworked by treating the deceased as a bachelor and applying appropriate multiplier and conventional heads. Documentary evidence of a valid driving licence displaced the insurer&#039;s recovery case, and the owner and driver were held entitled to indemnity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 08:33:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1374 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311996</link>
      <description>Contributory negligence could not be presumed from a head-on collision alone; where the tribunal&#039;s finding of rash and negligent driving by the truck was supported by the record, interference was unwarranted and the plea was rejected. In the death claim of a 51-year-old housewife, the compensation was enhanced on the basis of notional income, multiplier, consortium, loss of love and affection, and funeral expenses. In the claim concerning a 22-year-old unmarried man, the compensation was reworked by treating the deceased as a bachelor and applying appropriate multiplier and conventional heads. Documentary evidence of a valid driving licence displaced the insurer&#039;s recovery case, and the owner and driver were held entitled to indemnity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>