https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448675 The Tribunal condoned the 418-day delay in filing the appeal in ITA No. 2164/Del/2018 for AY 2007-08, finding the reasons sufficient. The rectification application rejection led to a common order for related appeals. The Tribunal restored the quantum appeal to the CIT(A) for re-adjudication, as the CIT(A) failed to consider the remand report on the disallowance of interest on borrowed funds. The appeal in ITA No. 2165/Del/2018 was allowed for statistical purposes, while ITA No. 2164/Del/2018 was dismissed as infructuous. The order was pronounced on 23/01/2024. en-us Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448675 The Tribunal condoned the 418-day delay in filing the appeal in ITA No. 2164/Del/2018 for AY 2007-08, finding the reasons sufficient. The rectification application rejection led to a common order for related appeals. The Tribunal restored the quantum appeal to the CIT(A) for re-adjudication, as the CIT(A) failed to consider the remand report on the disallowance of interest on borrowed funds. The appeal in ITA No. 2165/Del/2018 was allowed for statistical purposes, while ITA No. 2164/Del/2018 was dismissed as infructuous. The order was pronounced on 23/01/2024. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448675