https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35555 The Tribunal confirmed the demand for Service Tax against the applicant, who failed to demonstrate financial hardship and provide security agency services to Kolkata Metro. The applicant was directed to deposit Rs. 20,00,000 within six weeks, with the remaining pre-deposit amount and penalties waived upon compliance. The judgment emphasizes the need for accurate interpretation of services in tax disputes and compliance with deposit obligations to protect revenue interests. en-us Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35555 The Tribunal confirmed the demand for Service Tax against the applicant, who failed to demonstrate financial hardship and provide security agency services to Kolkata Metro. The applicant was directed to deposit Rs. 20,00,000 within six weeks, with the remaining pre-deposit amount and penalties waived upon compliance. The judgment emphasizes the need for accurate interpretation of services in tax disputes and compliance with deposit obligations to protect revenue interests. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35555