<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 115 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35552</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, ordered the appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 2,00,000 for stay of recovery pending appeal, concerning service tax, education cess, penalties under the Finance Act, interest, and other penalties. The Tribunal refrained from conclusively determining the appellant&#039;s status as a commission agent but noted justifications in the impugned order. The appellant&#039;s legal contentions disputing the commission agent label and duty calculation were presented, emphasizing the need for further examination during the final hearing. Compliance with the pre-deposit was mandated by a specified deadline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 115 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35552</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, ordered the appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 2,00,000 for stay of recovery pending appeal, concerning service tax, education cess, penalties under the Finance Act, interest, and other penalties. The Tribunal refrained from conclusively determining the appellant&#039;s status as a commission agent but noted justifications in the impugned order. The appellant&#039;s legal contentions disputing the commission agent label and duty calculation were presented, emphasizing the need for further examination during the final hearing. Compliance with the pre-deposit was mandated by a specified deadline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>