<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 192 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35550</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter back to the Original Authority and allowed the appeals of the Revenue, setting aside the impugned order regarding the availment of Cenvat credit on Service Tax paid on &#039;input services&#039;. The Commissioner (Appeals) was found to have exceeded the scope of the Revenue&#039;s grounds of appeal, leading to the successful challenge by the Consultant based on relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 192 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35550</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter back to the Original Authority and allowed the appeals of the Revenue, setting aside the impugned order regarding the availment of Cenvat credit on Service Tax paid on &#039;input services&#039;. The Commissioner (Appeals) was found to have exceeded the scope of the Revenue&#039;s grounds of appeal, leading to the successful challenge by the Consultant based on relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>