<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1053 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448654</link>
    <description>The HC stayed the impugned order dated 5th December 2023, challenged by the petitioner, as it conflicted with the SC&#039;s ruling in Canon India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs. The Court issued a rule and allowed respondents to waive service. As interim relief, the order was stayed, permitting respondents to apply for vacating it post the SC&#039;s decision in the pending review. All parties&#039; contentions remain open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:53:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1053 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448654</link>
      <description>The HC stayed the impugned order dated 5th December 2023, challenged by the petitioner, as it conflicted with the SC&#039;s ruling in Canon India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs. The Court issued a rule and allowed respondents to waive service. As interim relief, the order was stayed, permitting respondents to apply for vacating it post the SC&#039;s decision in the pending review. All parties&#039; contentions remain open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>