https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311986 Police custody under Section 57 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was treated as distinct from Magistrate-authorised remand custody, so it was excluded when computing the 90-day period under Section 167(2). On expiry of that period, the accused acquired an enforceable right to bail if prepared to furnish bail, and a later filing of the charge-sheet did not defeat that accrued right. Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 was held inapplicable to extend the period merely because the last day fell on a holiday. The note states that the bail order was sustained because the statutory custody period had expired. en-us Wed, 01 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:11:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311986 Police custody under Section 57 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was treated as distinct from Magistrate-authorised remand custody, so it was excluded when computing the 90-day period under Section 167(2). On expiry of that period, the accused acquired an enforceable right to bail if prepared to furnish bail, and a later filing of the charge-sheet did not defeat that accrued right. Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 was held inapplicable to extend the period merely because the last day fell on a holiday. The note states that the bail order was sustained because the statutory custody period had expired. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311986