https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311985 The 90-day period under Section 167(2) CrPC was to be computed by excluding one terminal day, and Sections 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act supported that method. On that calculation, the challan was filed before expiry of the full period, so the right to default bail was not available when the bail request was considered. Once the challan had been filed, the claimed indefeasible right no longer survived, and the order granting compulsive bail was unsustainable. en-us Wed, 01 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:05:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311985 The 90-day period under Section 167(2) CrPC was to be computed by excluding one terminal day, and Sections 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act supported that method. On that calculation, the challan was filed before expiry of the full period, so the right to default bail was not available when the bail request was considered. Once the challan had been filed, the claimed indefeasible right no longer survived, and the order granting compulsive bail was unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311985