<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 102 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35547</link>
    <description>A service tax dispute concerning a garba mahotsav activity was considered sufficiently debatable to warrant interim protection because the taxability of the function had not been finally determined and the event was organised by the Government. The Tribunal therefore granted conditional stay of recovery subject to partial compliance by way of pre-deposit. Upon deposit of the specified amount, recovery of the balance service tax remained stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 102 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35547</link>
      <description>A service tax dispute concerning a garba mahotsav activity was considered sufficiently debatable to warrant interim protection because the taxability of the function had not been finally determined and the event was organised by the Government. The Tribunal therefore granted conditional stay of recovery subject to partial compliance by way of pre-deposit. Upon deposit of the specified amount, recovery of the balance service tax remained stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>