<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Writ Petition not maintainable when proceedings dependent upon adequacy of evidence</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12248</link>
    <description>Denial of Input Tax Credit followed review of documents submitted by the petitioner, but the adjudication turned on the adequacy of evidence proving purchase and delivery-specifically a missing gate pass and the supplier being untraceable-matters that require factual fact-finding and therefore cannot be determined in writ proceedings under Article 226.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:35:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:35:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Writ Petition not maintainable when proceedings dependent upon adequacy of evidence</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12248</link>
      <description>Denial of Input Tax Credit followed review of documents submitted by the petitioner, but the adjudication turned on the adequacy of evidence proving purchase and delivery-specifically a missing gate pass and the supplier being untraceable-matters that require factual fact-finding and therefore cannot be determined in writ proceedings under Article 226.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:35:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>