<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1033 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448634</link>
    <description>The ITAT invalidated the penalty notice issued under section 271(1)(c)/274 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the failure to specify whether the penalty was for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Consequently, the penalty order was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal also found the penalty order unsustainable on merits, as the AO&#039;s additions were previously deleted or remanded. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the penalty order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1033 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448634</link>
      <description>The ITAT invalidated the penalty notice issued under section 271(1)(c)/274 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the failure to specify whether the penalty was for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Consequently, the penalty order was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal also found the penalty order unsustainable on merits, as the AO&#039;s additions were previously deleted or remanded. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the penalty order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>