<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1020 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448621</link>
    <description>The activity was treated as loading and unloading of export cargo, not manpower recruitment or supply agency service. The service recipient&#039;s replies and the appellant&#039;s statement consistently indicated that the engagement related to export cargo handling, and the Revenue did not dislodge that factual position. On that basis, the demand raised under manpower recruitment or supply agency service was found unsupported and not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:33:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1020 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448621</link>
      <description>The activity was treated as loading and unloading of export cargo, not manpower recruitment or supply agency service. The service recipient&#039;s replies and the appellant&#039;s statement consistently indicated that the engagement related to export cargo handling, and the Revenue did not dislodge that factual position. On that basis, the demand raised under manpower recruitment or supply agency service was found unsupported and not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>