https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311971 Mandamus was held unavailable because the petitioner had not shown a prior demand for performance and refusal, and no recognised exception to that settled requirement was established. Rule 35 of the Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Rules, 2018 was upheld as a valid and constitutional signage requirement because it mandated Marathi in Devanagari script while still permitting other languages and scripts, and the Court found a rational nexus with the statutory object and public convenience. The challenge under Articles 14, 19 and 29 failed, and costs were awarded against the petitioners. en-us Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:04:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311971 Mandamus was held unavailable because the petitioner had not shown a prior demand for performance and refusal, and no recognised exception to that settled requirement was established. Rule 35 of the Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Rules, 2018 was upheld as a valid and constitutional signage requirement because it mandated Marathi in Devanagari script while still permitting other languages and scripts, and the Court found a rational nexus with the statutory object and public convenience. The challenge under Articles 14, 19 and 29 failed, and costs were awarded against the petitioners. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311971