<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1399 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311963</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing their appeal and ordering the deletion of the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, as no expenditure was claimed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding no grounds for addition under section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding unreconciled receipts, concluding that the disallowance was unjustified due to variations in accounting methods. The order was pronounced on 13.02.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:04:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1399 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311963</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing their appeal and ordering the deletion of the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, as no expenditure was claimed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding no grounds for addition under section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding unreconciled receipts, concluding that the disallowance was unjustified due to variations in accounting methods. The order was pronounced on 13.02.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>