https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311960 For computing the 90-day period under the proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC, the date of arrest is excluded under the settled rule of exclusion of the first day and inclusion of the last, reflected in Section 9 of the General Clauses Act and Section 12 of the Limitation Act. Applying that method, a charge-sheet filed on the 90th day defeated the claim for default bail, and no statutory right arose. On merits, the record showed a prima facie case, including identification and recoveries, so continued custody was justified at the bail stage and the bail applications were rejected. en-us Thu, 31 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:48:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311960 For computing the 90-day period under the proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC, the date of arrest is excluded under the settled rule of exclusion of the first day and inclusion of the last, reflected in Section 9 of the General Clauses Act and Section 12 of the Limitation Act. Applying that method, a charge-sheet filed on the 90th day defeated the claim for default bail, and no statutory right arose. On merits, the record showed a prima facie case, including identification and recoveries, so continued custody was justified at the bail stage and the bail applications were rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311960