<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 215 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311959</link>
    <description>The period of detention authorised by the Magistrate under Section 167(2) in police custody is included when computing the outer limit of 90 days or 60 days under clauses (i) and (ii) of the proviso to Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The provision works with Section 57 and Section 167(2) as a single scheme: initial custody, Magistrate-authorised detention, and the statutory aggregate limit are meant to be counted together. The change from &quot;under this section&quot; to &quot;under this paragraph&quot; does not alter that position, and excluding earlier police custody would create anomalous results.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:44:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 215 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311959</link>
      <description>The period of detention authorised by the Magistrate under Section 167(2) in police custody is included when computing the outer limit of 90 days or 60 days under clauses (i) and (ii) of the proviso to Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The provision works with Section 57 and Section 167(2) as a single scheme: initial custody, Magistrate-authorised detention, and the statutory aggregate limit are meant to be counted together. The change from &quot;under this section&quot; to &quot;under this paragraph&quot; does not alter that position, and excluding earlier police custody would create anomalous results.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>