https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311956 For computing the sixty-day period under the proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC for default bail, the day of arrest was not to be counted. The Court treated the relevant starting point as the date on which the Magistrate authorised detention, and held that inclusion of the arrest date was not warranted on the facts. As the challan was not filed within the period argued by the petitioner, the bail claim failed on that ground. en-us Tue, 07 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:11:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311956 For computing the sixty-day period under the proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC for default bail, the day of arrest was not to be counted. The Court treated the relevant starting point as the date on which the Magistrate authorised detention, and held that inclusion of the arrest date was not warranted on the facts. As the challan was not filed within the period argued by the petitioner, the bail claim failed on that ground. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311956