https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311953 Relief under Article 226 may be refused where the challenge to a dismissal order is brought after inordinate delay, because unreasonable delay is ordinarily sufficient ground to decline discretionary writ interference. The text also notes that disputed questions arising from a departmental enquiry, including whether due opportunity was given and whether there was bias or mala fides, are largely factual matters and are not ordinarily resolved in writ proceedings. The availability of an ordinary civil remedy is relevant in deciding whether to grant extraordinary relief, so the writ challenge was not entertained. en-us Mon, 24 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:42:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311953 Relief under Article 226 may be refused where the challenge to a dismissal order is brought after inordinate delay, because unreasonable delay is ordinarily sufficient ground to decline discretionary writ interference. The text also notes that disputed questions arising from a departmental enquiry, including whether due opportunity was given and whether there was bias or mala fides, are largely factual matters and are not ordinarily resolved in writ proceedings. The availability of an ordinary civil remedy is relevant in deciding whether to grant extraordinary relief, so the writ challenge was not entertained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311953