<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 96 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35528</link>
    <description>CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the Revenue appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) in allowing Cenvat credit to the assessee on multiple input services. The Tribunal found no material showing phones, rent-a-cab, insurance premiums, courier (inward freight), C&amp;F charges, air travel, pager, or maintenance/repair services were used otherwise than for business or manufacturing-related activities, and held the partial allowances were justified after document verification. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 96 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35528</link>
      <description>CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the Revenue appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) in allowing Cenvat credit to the assessee on multiple input services. The Tribunal found no material showing phones, rent-a-cab, insurance premiums, courier (inward freight), C&amp;F charges, air travel, pager, or maintenance/repair services were used otherwise than for business or manufacturing-related activities, and held the partial allowances were justified after document verification. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>