https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311937 The HC set aside the impugned orders disqualifying the Petitioner as a director under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2013. The Court found that the disqualification was improperly applied with retrospective effect and highlighted the incorrect fixing of financial years. It emphasized the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice, including proper notice to directors. The judgment clarified that disqualification should not extend to other companies if directors comply with legal requirements, ultimately granting relief to the Petitioner and aligning with similar cases. en-us Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:11:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311937 The HC set aside the impugned orders disqualifying the Petitioner as a director under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2013. The Court found that the disqualification was improperly applied with retrospective effect and highlighted the incorrect fixing of financial years. It emphasized the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice, including proper notice to directors. The judgment clarified that disqualification should not extend to other companies if directors comply with legal requirements, ultimately granting relief to the Petitioner and aligning with similar cases. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311937