<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 109 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35523</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty under Section 76 from Rs. 1,30,860 to Rs. 41,000 based on the appellant&#039;s payment of service tax with interest before the show cause notice. While acknowledging that Section 76 mandates a minimum penalty without the authority to reduce it, the Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s reasons for reduction justifiable. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected as they did not challenge these reasons, and the penalty amount set by the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld, with the Tribunal disposing of the cross-objections filed by the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 109 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35523</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty under Section 76 from Rs. 1,30,860 to Rs. 41,000 based on the appellant&#039;s payment of service tax with interest before the show cause notice. While acknowledging that Section 76 mandates a minimum penalty without the authority to reduce it, the Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s reasons for reduction justifiable. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected as they did not challenge these reasons, and the penalty amount set by the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld, with the Tribunal disposing of the cross-objections filed by the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>