https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311929 Circumstantial evidence supported conviction where motive, last-seen proximity, recoveries at the accused's instance, and finger-print evidence were found admissible and reliable. The Court accepted the grievance-based motive, the deceased having last been seen with the accused, credible recovery evidence, and the admissibility of the Finger Print Bureau report. Excluding one doubtful recovery, the remaining circumstances still formed a complete chain: motive, presence with the deceased before death, finger-prints at the scene, matching physical evidence, and blood-stained articles recovered from the accused. The chain was consistent only with guilt and proved murder beyond reasonable doubt, so the acquittal was set aside and life imprisonment restored. en-us Tue, 07 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:26:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311929 Circumstantial evidence supported conviction where motive, last-seen proximity, recoveries at the accused's instance, and finger-print evidence were found admissible and reliable. The Court accepted the grievance-based motive, the deceased having last been seen with the accused, credible recovery evidence, and the admissibility of the Finger Print Bureau report. Excluding one doubtful recovery, the remaining circumstances still formed a complete chain: motive, presence with the deceased before death, finger-prints at the scene, matching physical evidence, and blood-stained articles recovered from the accused. The chain was consistent only with guilt and proved murder beyond reasonable doubt, so the acquittal was set aside and life imprisonment restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311929