<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (9) TMI 196 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311926</link>
    <description>Testimony of interested trap witnesses must be scrutinised with great caution, and a conviction cannot safely rest on such evidence without dependable independent corroboration of demand, payment and recovery. A witness who is declared hostile does not lose all evidentiary value, but only the credible part of his testimony may be used; isolated, discredited answers and previous police statements cannot serve as substantive corroboration. An accused&#039;s silence when confronted with a bribery allegation, or the detention of a complainant, is not by itself reliable proof of guilt where innocent explanations remain plausible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (9) TMI 196 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311926</link>
      <description>Testimony of interested trap witnesses must be scrutinised with great caution, and a conviction cannot safely rest on such evidence without dependable independent corroboration of demand, payment and recovery. A witness who is declared hostile does not lose all evidentiary value, but only the credible part of his testimony may be used; isolated, discredited answers and previous police statements cannot serve as substantive corroboration. An accused&#039;s silence when confronted with a bribery allegation, or the detention of a complainant, is not by itself reliable proof of guilt where innocent explanations remain plausible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>