https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448556 Compulsory retirement under Fundamental Rule 56(j) may be based on the entire service record, including integrity-related adverse material and confidential assessments, and later promotions do not erase earlier entries when retention in service is assessed. Separate approval of the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet and consultation with the Central Vigilance Commission were not treated as mandatory on the applicable instructions, and the Chief Vigilance Officer's role in the review process was regarded as sufficient on integrity concerns. Common membership across review and representation committees, without more, did not establish bias, and limited natural justice requirements apply in compulsory retirement matters. The retirement order was therefore described as supported by relevant material and public interest considerations. en-us Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448556 Compulsory retirement under Fundamental Rule 56(j) may be based on the entire service record, including integrity-related adverse material and confidential assessments, and later promotions do not erase earlier entries when retention in service is assessed. Separate approval of the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet and consultation with the Central Vigilance Commission were not treated as mandatory on the applicable instructions, and the Chief Vigilance Officer's role in the review process was regarded as sufficient on integrity concerns. Common membership across review and representation committees, without more, did not establish bias, and limited natural justice requirements apply in compulsory retirement matters. The retirement order was therefore described as supported by relevant material and public interest considerations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448556