<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 951 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448552</link>
    <description>A Special Leave Petition was declined because the tax effect was below the monetary threshold recorded by the High Court, so the Supreme Court did not entertain the matter. The dismissal was confined to that threshold-based non-entertainment and did not determine the merits. The substantive question of law was expressly left open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=741001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 951 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448552</link>
      <description>A Special Leave Petition was declined because the tax effect was below the monetary threshold recorded by the High Court, so the Supreme Court did not entertain the matter. The dismissal was confined to that threshold-based non-entertainment and did not determine the merits. The substantive question of law was expressly left open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>