<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 936 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448537</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on duty-paid or tax-paid inputs, capital goods and input services is available even where they are received at premises other than the registered premises, because separate registration of those premises is not a condition precedent when the goods or services are used for providing the output service. The commentary also notes that the extended period of limitation and penalty require evidence of wilful misstatement or suppression of facts; in the absence of such evidence, neither can be sustained. The settled position therefore treats non-registration alone as insufficient to deny credit, and absence of suppression as fatal to extended limitation and penal consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:24:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 936 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448537</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on duty-paid or tax-paid inputs, capital goods and input services is available even where they are received at premises other than the registered premises, because separate registration of those premises is not a condition precedent when the goods or services are used for providing the output service. The commentary also notes that the extended period of limitation and penalty require evidence of wilful misstatement or suppression of facts; in the absence of such evidence, neither can be sustained. The settled position therefore treats non-registration alone as insufficient to deny credit, and absence of suppression as fatal to extended limitation and penal consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>