https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311920 The Court set aside the convictions under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, acquitting the Appellant, a Deputy Tahsildar, of all charges. The decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence proving the demand for illegal gratification, as the complainant did not support the prosecution's case. The Court emphasized that possession and recovery of tainted currency notes alone do not suffice to establish the offense without proof of demand, thus highlighting the necessity of proving both demand and acceptance to uphold such convictions. en-us Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:39:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311920 The Court set aside the convictions under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, acquitting the Appellant, a Deputy Tahsildar, of all charges. The decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence proving the demand for illegal gratification, as the complainant did not support the prosecution's case. The Court emphasized that possession and recovery of tainted currency notes alone do not suffice to establish the offense without proof of demand, thus highlighting the necessity of proving both demand and acceptance to uphold such convictions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311920