<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 106 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35505</link>
    <description>The case involved misdeclaration of country of origin in imported goods, leading to confiscation and penalties. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine for the goods, set aside penalties on the appellants, and excluded confiscated goods from Net Foreign Exchange calculation. The majority order favored the appellants, acknowledging a mistake rather than deliberate intent, resulting in reduced penalties and fines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 106 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35505</link>
      <description>The case involved misdeclaration of country of origin in imported goods, leading to confiscation and penalties. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine for the goods, set aside penalties on the appellants, and excluded confiscated goods from Net Foreign Exchange calculation. The majority order favored the appellants, acknowledging a mistake rather than deliberate intent, resulting in reduced penalties and fines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>