https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311908 Circumstantial evidence in kidnapping and murder prosecutions must establish each incriminating circumstance, form a complete chain consistent only with guilt, and exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Family hostility supplied motive; witnesses placed the child last with the accused and travelling towards a hillock; and recoveries based on investigation information, supported by human blood detected on seized clothing, reinforced the prosecution narrative. Minor inconsistencies concerning the recovered body's condition did not materially undermine the otherwise consistent evidentiary chain. The material describes that the prosecution's case met the beyond-reasonable-doubt standard and that the convictions and sentences were upheld. en-us Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jan 2024 12:02:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311908 Circumstantial evidence in kidnapping and murder prosecutions must establish each incriminating circumstance, form a complete chain consistent only with guilt, and exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Family hostility supplied motive; witnesses placed the child last with the accused and travelling towards a hillock; and recoveries based on investigation information, supported by human blood detected on seized clothing, reinforced the prosecution narrative. Minor inconsistencies concerning the recovered body's condition did not materially undermine the otherwise consistent evidentiary chain. The material describes that the prosecution's case met the beyond-reasonable-doubt standard and that the convictions and sentences were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311908