https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311901 The SC upheld the conviction of the appellant, a Factory Inspector, under Section 161, IPC and Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, for demanding and accepting bribes. The court found the evidence, including witness testimony and the presence of phenolphthalein powder, credible and sufficient to prove the charges. The appellant's defenses were rejected, including claims of evidence tampering and unreliable witnesses. The presumption under Section 4(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act was deemed valid. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant's bail bond was canceled, requiring him to serve his sentence. en-us Thu, 14 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jan 2024 11:04:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311901 The SC upheld the conviction of the appellant, a Factory Inspector, under Section 161, IPC and Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, for demanding and accepting bribes. The court found the evidence, including witness testimony and the presence of phenolphthalein powder, credible and sufficient to prove the charges. The appellant's defenses were rejected, including claims of evidence tampering and unreliable witnesses. The presumption under Section 4(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act was deemed valid. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant's bail bond was canceled, requiring him to serve his sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311901