<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 898 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448499</link>
    <description>NCLAT Chennai dismissed condonation of delay applications for two appeals filed 10 days beyond limitation. The Appellant made false averments claiming appeals were within limitation period while simultaneously seeking condonation of delay. The Appellant failed to apply for certified copies and took contradictory positions regarding limitation calculation. First appeal used free certified copy available on 01.08.2023, second appeal relied on RP&#039;s copy dated 07.08.2023. NCLAT found no sufficient cause established for the 10-day delay and noted the Appellant&#039;s suppressio veri and suggestio falsi in making incorrect statements under verification. Both applications dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 898 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448499</link>
      <description>NCLAT Chennai dismissed condonation of delay applications for two appeals filed 10 days beyond limitation. The Appellant made false averments claiming appeals were within limitation period while simultaneously seeking condonation of delay. The Appellant failed to apply for certified copies and took contradictory positions regarding limitation calculation. First appeal used free certified copy available on 01.08.2023, second appeal relied on RP&#039;s copy dated 07.08.2023. NCLAT found no sufficient cause established for the 10-day delay and noted the Appellant&#039;s suppressio veri and suggestio falsi in making incorrect statements under verification. Both applications dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>