<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 893 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448494</link>
    <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that appellant&#039;s construction services during 2005-2008 constituted Works Contract Service, qualifying for composite scheme benefits. The tribunal found service tax levy prior to 01/06/2007 unsustainable, citing SC precedent in Total Environment Building Systems case. Denial of Works Contract Service benefits from 01/06/2007 was deemed legally improper. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed, with appellant&#039;s VAT returns supporting the Works Contract Service classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 893 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448494</link>
      <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that appellant&#039;s construction services during 2005-2008 constituted Works Contract Service, qualifying for composite scheme benefits. The tribunal found service tax levy prior to 01/06/2007 unsustainable, citing SC precedent in Total Environment Building Systems case. Denial of Works Contract Service benefits from 01/06/2007 was deemed legally improper. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed, with appellant&#039;s VAT returns supporting the Works Contract Service classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>