https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448485 The HC found that the authority failed to provide a proper hearing opportunity to the petitioners as directed by the CESTAT. However, the Court held that the writ petition was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy through the appeal process. Consequently, the HC declined to entertain the writ petition but granted the petitioners the liberty to file an appeal. The Court made no observations on the merits of the case, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jan 2024 08:22:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448485 The HC found that the authority failed to provide a proper hearing opportunity to the petitioners as directed by the CESTAT. However, the Court held that the writ petition was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy through the appeal process. Consequently, the HC declined to entertain the writ petition but granted the petitioners the liberty to file an appeal. The Court made no observations on the merits of the case, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448485