https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448485 A writ petition challenging an excise adjudication confirming demand and imposing penalties was found not maintainable because an effective statutory appellate remedy was available. The Court held that alleged procedural lapses and complaints of non-compliance with earlier remand directions could be raised before the appellate forum, and that extraordinary writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass that remedy. The petition was therefore not entertained, while the petitioners were left free to pursue the statutory appeal, with no finding on the merits of the adjudication. en-us Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jan 2024 08:22:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448485 A writ petition challenging an excise adjudication confirming demand and imposing penalties was found not maintainable because an effective statutory appellate remedy was available. The Court held that alleged procedural lapses and complaints of non-compliance with earlier remand directions could be raised before the appellate forum, and that extraordinary writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass that remedy. The petition was therefore not entertained, while the petitioners were left free to pursue the statutory appeal, with no finding on the merits of the adjudication. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448485