<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1547 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311894</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding unaccounted cash receipts found during survey operations. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions, finding that amounts were either already recorded in books as customer advances, pertained to different assessment years, were duplicate entries, or were not actually received by the assessee. For assessment year 2007-08, ITAT confirmed most deletions but directed verification of two transactions claimed as bank transfers. The tribunal also held that assessment notices issued by unauthorized officers were invalid, making the assessment order unsustainable. Regarding audit under section 44AB, ITAT ruled it inapplicable due to absence of turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 20:19:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1547 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311894</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding unaccounted cash receipts found during survey operations. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions, finding that amounts were either already recorded in books as customer advances, pertained to different assessment years, were duplicate entries, or were not actually received by the assessee. For assessment year 2007-08, ITAT confirmed most deletions but directed verification of two transactions claimed as bank transfers. The tribunal also held that assessment notices issued by unauthorized officers were invalid, making the assessment order unsustainable. Regarding audit under section 44AB, ITAT ruled it inapplicable due to absence of turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>