https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35482 The High Court of Calcutta allowed the petition for condonation of delay in filing the application (C.A. No. 867 of 2008). It upheld the Tribunal's decision recognizing suppliers of hides and skins as producers under rule 6DD(f)(ii), stating that processing by suppliers qualifies them as producers. The Court rejected the disallowance of payments to suppliers under section 40A(3), finding the transactions genuine. The appeal (I.T.A. No. 186) was dismissed as no substantial question of law was involved, with parties instructed to act on a xerox signed copy of the order. en-us Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 May 2011 13:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35482 The High Court of Calcutta allowed the petition for condonation of delay in filing the application (C.A. No. 867 of 2008). It upheld the Tribunal's decision recognizing suppliers of hides and skins as producers under rule 6DD(f)(ii), stating that processing by suppliers qualifies them as producers. The Court rejected the disallowance of payments to suppliers under section 40A(3), finding the transactions genuine. The appeal (I.T.A. No. 186) was dismissed as no substantial question of law was involved, with parties instructed to act on a xerox signed copy of the order. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35482