<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 826 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311891</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It deleted the addition of Rs. 2,67,428/- on account of Gross Profit on wheat, as it found no specific discrepancies in the books of account and noted that low profit alone does not justify such an addition. However, the Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s contention regarding the lack of opportunity to be heard before directions under section 144A, as no specific directions affecting the assessment were issued by the Addl. CIT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 826 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311891</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It deleted the addition of Rs. 2,67,428/- on account of Gross Profit on wheat, as it found no specific discrepancies in the books of account and noted that low profit alone does not justify such an addition. However, the Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s contention regarding the lack of opportunity to be heard before directions under section 144A, as no specific directions affecting the assessment were issued by the Addl. CIT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>