<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 395 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35480</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s failure to make a full and true disclosure, leading to discrepancies in the information provided. The court found that the complexity of accounts did not warrant intervention and that the special audit order was invalid due to the lack of a hearing. Consequently, the order for a special audit was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a fresh decision with the petitioner afforded an opportunity for a hearing, ensuring procedural fairness in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 395 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35480</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s failure to make a full and true disclosure, leading to discrepancies in the information provided. The court found that the complexity of accounts did not warrant intervention and that the special audit order was invalid due to the lack of a hearing. Consequently, the order for a special audit was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a fresh decision with the petitioner afforded an opportunity for a hearing, ensuring procedural fairness in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>