https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448474 Writ relief was declined where goods detained under GST had been released after the penalty amount was deposited, and the petitioner had an available statutory appellate remedy. The HC held that challenge to the detention order and penalty should ordinarily be pursued through appeal rather than writ jurisdiction, particularly where the impugned action was taken under the relevant statutory scheme. Relying on the principle that writ petitions against show cause notices or similar statutory proceedings are not ordinarily maintainable, the Court disposed of the petition without examining the merits and granted liberty to file the appropriate appeal within four weeks. en-us Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448474 Writ relief was declined where goods detained under GST had been released after the penalty amount was deposited, and the petitioner had an available statutory appellate remedy. The HC held that challenge to the detention order and penalty should ordinarily be pursued through appeal rather than writ jurisdiction, particularly where the impugned action was taken under the relevant statutory scheme. Relying on the principle that writ petitions against show cause notices or similar statutory proceedings are not ordinarily maintainable, the Court disposed of the petition without examining the merits and granted liberty to file the appropriate appeal within four weeks. Case-Laws GST Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448474