<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 847 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448448</link>
    <description>ITAT Chandigarh held that the original assessment order validly applied sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act and merged with the CIT(A)&#039;s confirmatory order under the doctrine of merger. The tribunal rejected the department&#039;s contention that the assessment was void ab-initio due to alleged inadvertent reference to sections 11 and 12. For an educational institution approved under section 10(23C)(vi), the tribunal deleted additions made by invoking sections 11 and 12, ruled that tied-up government grants constituted grant-in-aid and were exempt from tax, and allowed depreciation as the assessee had not claimed asset acquisition as application of income under section 11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 847 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448448</link>
      <description>ITAT Chandigarh held that the original assessment order validly applied sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act and merged with the CIT(A)&#039;s confirmatory order under the doctrine of merger. The tribunal rejected the department&#039;s contention that the assessment was void ab-initio due to alleged inadvertent reference to sections 11 and 12. For an educational institution approved under section 10(23C)(vi), the tribunal deleted additions made by invoking sections 11 and 12, ruled that tied-up government grants constituted grant-in-aid and were exempt from tax, and allowed depreciation as the assessee had not claimed asset acquisition as application of income under section 11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>