<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 824 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448425</link>
    <description>Restoration of appeal concerned non-payment of the mandated pre-deposit under the Central Excise regime; failure to deposit was held to deprive the tribunal of jurisdiction and render it functus officio, with that conclusion determining the availability of appellate relief. The High Court affirmed this jurisdictional consequence on the stated facts. On further challenge, the special leave petition was dismissed and the impugned High Court order left undisturbed, while liberty was granted to seek review of that order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 824 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448425</link>
      <description>Restoration of appeal concerned non-payment of the mandated pre-deposit under the Central Excise regime; failure to deposit was held to deprive the tribunal of jurisdiction and render it functus officio, with that conclusion determining the availability of appellate relief. The High Court affirmed this jurisdictional consequence on the stated facts. On further challenge, the special leave petition was dismissed and the impugned High Court order left undisturbed, while liberty was granted to seek review of that order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>