<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 818 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448419</link>
    <description>Cement cleared in 50 kg bags to industrial or institutional consumers was treated as eligible for the concessional rate under Sl. No. 1C of Notification No. 4/2006-CE, because the absence of a retail sale price declaration could not by itself defeat the exemption where such declaration was not required under the packaged commodities rules. The text also notes that a duty demand based on vague show cause notices, without a clear factual foundation showing retail sales or excluding industrial or institutional consumers, is vulnerable, and that prolonged adjudication may further weaken the demand. On this reasoning, the duty and interest confirmation were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 818 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448419</link>
      <description>Cement cleared in 50 kg bags to industrial or institutional consumers was treated as eligible for the concessional rate under Sl. No. 1C of Notification No. 4/2006-CE, because the absence of a retail sale price declaration could not by itself defeat the exemption where such declaration was not required under the packaged commodities rules. The text also notes that a duty demand based on vague show cause notices, without a clear factual foundation showing retail sales or excluding industrial or institutional consumers, is vulnerable, and that prolonged adjudication may further weaken the demand. On this reasoning, the duty and interest confirmation were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>