<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 815 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448416</link>
    <description>The writ petition contested the detention of the petitioner&#039;s vehicle and goods by the 2nd respondent. The court ordered the petitioner to deposit 25% of the penalty and provide a bank guarantee for the remaining 75%. Upon fulfilling these conditions, the respondent was instructed to release the vehicle and goods. The petition was disposed of without costs, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 08:46:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 815 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448416</link>
      <description>The writ petition contested the detention of the petitioner&#039;s vehicle and goods by the 2nd respondent. The court ordered the petitioner to deposit 25% of the penalty and provide a bank guarantee for the remaining 75%. Upon fulfilling these conditions, the respondent was instructed to release the vehicle and goods. The petition was disposed of without costs, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>