<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1669 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311886</link>
    <description>At the stage of framing charge, the court need only assess whether the record discloses sufficient ground for proceeding and a strong suspicion of the accused&#039;s involvement; it must not weigh the truth or probative value of the prosecution material as if deciding guilt after trial. On the charge-sheet material, the deceased was last seen with the accused, the body was found in the accused&#039;s field, there was alleged non-reporting to the family and police, and motive was indicated. These circumstances were sufficient to proceed, so the High Court erred in quashing the charges and the trial court&#039;s order framing charges was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1669 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311886</link>
      <description>At the stage of framing charge, the court need only assess whether the record discloses sufficient ground for proceeding and a strong suspicion of the accused&#039;s involvement; it must not weigh the truth or probative value of the prosecution material as if deciding guilt after trial. On the charge-sheet material, the deceased was last seen with the accused, the body was found in the accused&#039;s field, there was alleged non-reporting to the family and police, and motive was indicated. These circumstances were sufficient to proceed, so the High Court erred in quashing the charges and the trial court&#039;s order framing charges was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>