https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311883 At the discharge or charge stage, the court must assess only whether the prosecution material, taken at face value, discloses a prima facie case or grave suspicion; the accused cannot rely on disputed defence material or explanations to secure discharge, because a mini trial and evaluation of defence evidence are impermissible. Revisional interference is confined to patent illegality, jurisdictional error, perversity, or material disregard of law, and the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or treat disputed facts as proved. Applied to a disproportionate assets prosecution, the trial court's refusal to discharge was correct and the High Court's interference was unwarranted. en-us Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:18:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311883 At the discharge or charge stage, the court must assess only whether the prosecution material, taken at face value, discloses a prima facie case or grave suspicion; the accused cannot rely on disputed defence material or explanations to secure discharge, because a mini trial and evaluation of defence evidence are impermissible. Revisional interference is confined to patent illegality, jurisdictional error, perversity, or material disregard of law, and the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or treat disputed facts as proved. Applied to a disproportionate assets prosecution, the trial court's refusal to discharge was correct and the High Court's interference was unwarranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311883